WASHINGTON, D.C. – May 22, 2026 — U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced Friday that the United States is actively seeking international support through the United Nations to block Iran from implementing a tolling system in the Strait of Hormuz, describing the move as illegal, unacceptable, and a serious threat to global trade.
In remarks shared by the State Department, Rubio stated: “We are doing everything we can to achieve the global consensus necessary to prevent Iran from creating a tolling system, and we’re trying to use the United Nations. Let’s see if the UN still works.”
The comments come amid fragile ceasefire negotiations following U.S.-Israeli military strikes on Iran earlier in 2026. Iran has partially restricted access to the Strait of Hormuz — a critical chokepoint that handles roughly 20% of the world’s oil supply — in response to the conflict, leading to disrupted shipping, soaring energy prices, and significant economic strain globally.
Rubio emphasized that no country should accept Iran’s efforts to charge fees for passage through the international waterway. “It can’t happen,” he said in related statements. “It would be unacceptable and it would make a diplomatic deal unfeasible.” He added that the U.S. prefers a diplomatic resolution but maintains other options if Iran proceeds.
Background and Economic Impact
The Strait of Hormuz has been a flashpoint since the escalation of hostilities. Iran’s threats to impose tolls or further control the strait have raised fears of prolonged disruption to global energy markets. Oil prices have surged, with analysts warning of potential recession-level impacts if the waterway remains heavily restricted.
The U.S. has previously warned shipping companies against paying any Iranian tolls, threatening sanctions for those who comply. President Donald Trump has also publicly rejected the idea of tolls, insisting the strait must remain open and free for international navigation.
Diplomatic Context
Rubio’s appeal to the UN highlights a delicate balance in U.S. strategy: pursuing multilateral support while expressing skepticism about the organization’s effectiveness. Indirect talks mediated by third parties continue, with some “movement” reported, but core issues — including Iran’s nuclear program and freedom of navigation — remain unresolved.
Reactions on social media have been sharply divided, with some users criticizing the U.S. for turning to the UN after past tensions, while others urge stronger action against the Iranian regime.
The State Department did not immediately respond to requests for further comment on timelines for UN action or potential alternatives if diplomacy fails.
This story is developing.
About The Author
