By: Dato Seri Mustapa Mohamed
The Strait of Hormuz narrows to just 21 miles wide. Through this needle’s eye passes about a fifth of the world’s oil consumption. Recently, as drones flew and ships were seized, the world watched the chokepoint with bated breath. For a moment, the global economy didn’t just worry about a climate crisis; it panicked over an energy crisis.
In that panic, a glaring truth emerged that often gets lost in environmental summits and carbon-neutral pledges: The fight against fossil fuels is not just a fight for the planet; it is a fight for the very architecture of global financial control. The recent Iran-US tensions have laid bare the uncomfortable reality that the “petrodollar” is the invisible hand strangling our climate progress.
To understand why the transition to green energy faces such vehement geopolitical opposition, we must look not at the smokestack, but at the Treasury bond. The system, established in the 1970s, is elegantly simple and brutally effective: all major oil transactions are denominated in US dollars. This creates an insatiable global demand for dollars, allowing the United States to run massive deficits, fund its military, and maintain economic supremacy. If you phase out oil, you phase out the dollar’s monopoly.
The recent conflict with Iran brought this into razor-sharp focus. When the Strait of Hormuz is threatened, it is not merely a supply chain issue; it is an attack on the dollar zone. The panic in the markets wasn’t just about expensive gasoline; it was a primal scream from a system realizing its own fragility. Any disruption to the flow of oil is an existential threat to an American economy that has structured the entire post-war world order around the black gold standard.
This is why the “phase out” rhetoric from Western capitals often rings hollow in the ears of many oil-dependent nations. They see the United States, a country that has oscillated between being a climate leader and a drill-baby-drill advocate, suddenly sanctioning nations that try to sell oil in currencies other than the dollar (think of the pressure on nations trading with China in yuan). It appears less like a moral crusade to save the ice caps and more like a strategic defense of the realm.
For nations like Russia, Iran, and even some Gulf states, the move toward renewable energy is a double-edged sword. On one hand, they face an existential climate threat. On the other, the very source of their sovereign wealth, their geopolitical leverage, and their internal stability is a barrel of oil. To ask them to abandon it is to ask them to dismantle their power structures.
The conflict reveals that the petrodollar is a “petroledger”—a historical debt that the US economy owes to oil. The US has a vested interest in keeping the commodity valuable and in circulation, not because Americans love pollution, but because the seigniorage (the profit from issuing currency) allows the state to function. If the world shifts to a decentralized, electrified energy grid, powered by sun and wind that exists everywhere and nowhere, where does the demand for dollars go? It evaporates.
This doesn’t mean we are doomed to burn forever. But it does mean that the energy transition is not just a technological problem to be solved by better batteries. It is a geopolitical land grab. The resistance to phasing out fossil fuels isn’t just about oil company lobbyists (though they play a part); it is about the fear of a power vacuum. If the petrodollar collapses, what replaces the US Navy’s ability to keep the sea lanes open? What replaces the Treasury’s ability to borrow at rates others cannot?
The “panic” many correctly identify during the Strait of Hormuz closures is the sound of a system realizing its own Achilles’ heel. It highlights that until we decouple global financial stability from the flow of oil, every climate conference will be a negotiation over how to commit suicide slowly. The countries vehemently opposing the phase-out are not just climate deniers; they are survivalists trying to protect the currency of their power.
The path forward, therefore, is not just about green technology. It must be about a new financial architecture. We need a “climate dollar” or a basket of currencies for energy trade that severs the link between geopolitical blackmail and environmental policy. Until we solve the petrodollar puzzle, we will continue to see wars fought over oil, and climate progress held hostage by the very real fears of economic collapse. The fight for the planet is, and always has been, a fight for a new economic order. The tension in the Persian Gulf is just the opening salvo.
The author is an Advisor at the Ungku Aziz Centre for Development Studies (UAC), Universiti Malaya
About The Author
