PUTRAJAYA, Malaysia, July 18, 2025 – Prime Minister Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim has stepped forward to address the ongoing controversy surrounding the appointment of Malaysia’s new Chief Justice, aiming to clarify the process and dispel weeks of public criticism and speculation.
In a detailed statement, Anwar emphasized that the appointment of Datuk Wan Ahmad Farid Wan Salleh as Chief Justice was conducted in strict adherence to institutional principles and the 122B clause of the Malaysian Constitution. This move came after the retirement of former Chief Justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, which had left the position vacant and sparked intense debate over the selection process.
The appointment of Wan Ahmad Farid, bypassing the widely anticipated Tan Sri Ahmad Terrirudin Mohd Salleh, has raised questions about political expediency versus judicial independence. Legal sources have indicated that this decision has triggered allegations that the Madani government is attempting to exert more influence over the judiciary.
Anwar’s intervention seeks to reassure the public that the process was transparent and followed due procedure, despite the backlash.
“The process from the Judicial Appointments Commission to the final decision was based on clear institutional principles,” Anwar stated, highlighting consultations with key figures including the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and the Conference of Rulers.
The controversy has been part of broader discussions on Malaysia’s judicial integrity, with concerns about executive influence and the need for transparency in high-level appointments. The Madani government’s approach to judicial reforms is under scrutiny, especially as it navigates the delicate balance between executive power and judicial autonomy.
This development comes at a time when Malaysia’s judiciary is at a crossroads, with the public and political figures closely watching how the government handles such critical appointments. The official swearing-in of Wan Ahmad Farid and other judicial appointments is scheduled for July 28 at Istana Negara, before the King.
As Malaysia continues to grapple with these issues, the outcome of this controversy could have significant implications for the country’s judicial system and its perception of fairness and independence.